๐๐ถ๐๐๐ฟ.๐๐: ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฉ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ผ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
Weโve all seen tons of media, social postings โ you name it โ around humanoid robotic development in the last three to six months. We felt it was time to weigh in.
At Fizyr, ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐น๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ in the warehouse management space, in truck/container loading & unloading, and food processing โ just to name a few.
However, in most ๐ฝ๐๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฒ-๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐น๐ warehouse (or other) environments, full of moving conveyors, fork-lifts, heavy loads, with high-volume requirements, the tasks that require automation seem outside the wheelhouse of the humanoids. A few key points:
โข While ๐ต๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ผ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น-๐ฝ๐๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ธ๐, specialized warehouse robots often excel in specific functions (e.g., heavy lifting, precise picking, high volume throughput). โข The GENERALIST nature of humanoids ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐, ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐น๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐, compared to “specialist” machines. โข Humanoid robots may struggle with the ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ธ๐ถ๐น๐น๐ required for delicate or irregular items, when compared to a task-specific end effector or gripper.
There is an element of flexibility that humanoids can bring to some use cases: We humans built a lot of these places for other humans to walk around, work, pick up stuff. However, ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ธ ๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ โ or involves the โdull, dirty & dangerousโ jobs that humans are phasing out of in droves – we general see the specialized automation designs for full system integrations, and even many of the brownfield integrations, as the preferred choice.
Our conclusion: Yes, there is too much hype. Itโs use-case dependent, of course. But many high-volume situations are not conducive to humanoid robot integration versus purpose-built automation cells.
Thanks for reading, comments welcome, of course.